The Focus Portfolio retains an underweight exposure to iron ore.
Risks are skewed to the downside for iron ore prices in FY25, while the long-term outlook for iron ore demand is clouded by structural headwinds within China’s property market.
However, Australia’s iron ore miners are some of the highest quality producers in the world, and there are fundamental reasons to remain invested selectively within the sector, including Australia’s low position on the cost curve and the sector's reinvestment of iron ore profits into ‘future facing’ commodities.
Our preferred exposures are BHP (BHP) and Mineral Resources (MIN), which are explored in this report.
Risks Skewed to the Downside
China’s housing market and steel demand remains subdued
The iron ore price has remained above its long-term average over the last 12 months as weakness in China’s property market has been offset by strong steel exports, infrastructure and manufacturing investment, and measured stimulus efforts.
Nevertheless, the near-term outlook for iron ore demand remains subdued due to soft domestic steel demand from China’s property and construction sectors, combined with uncertainty around China’s future stimulus plans.
While China has announced stimulus to support its struggling property sector (cuts to mortgage rates, loans to local governments to buy unsold homes), aggregate steel (and hence iron ore) demand remains subdued, and structural imbalances within China’s property sector are an ongoing challenge (more on this below).
Iron ore prices - risks are skewed to the downside in FY25
Everything considered, given ongoing weakness in China’s property market, risks are skewed to the downside for the iron ore price over the medium-term.
Forecasts for the balance of the 2024 calendar year range from US$110-90/tonne. In line with our thinking, the consensus of analyst estimates point to a moderately lower iron ore price in FY25 (consensus of ~US$96 vs spot of ~US$107).
With that being said, iron ore should find cost support around ~US$80-90/tonne, noting Wood Mackenzie’s latest global cost curve shows the 90th percentile of iron ore producers operate at a cash cost of US$86/tonne.
Over the last five years the iron ore price has consistently found cost support at ~US$80/tonne.
Long Term Outlook - Iron Ore has a China Problem
The long-term demand outlook for the steel (and hence iron ore) is clouded by structural imbalances in China’s property market and the country’s desire to transition towards a modern, consumption-centred economy.
After two decades of rapid growth in steel demand driven by property construction and infrastructure investment, China’s future growth in steel demand is unlikely to match the levels witnessed historically. The World Steel Association forecasts 1-2% global demand growth over the next decade.
Structural pressures on China's housing market are weighing on steel demand
China’s property sector is key to iron ore demand as it accounts for ~30% of its domestic steel consumption.
The country’s housing market is under significant pressure amidst falling house prices, weak new home sales volumes, and depressed construction activity. Demand for new housing in China is set to drop by ~50% over the next decade according to the IMF, driven by:
- Housing oversupply – after years of speculative housing construction from heavily indebted developers, there is a mismatch of supply/demand. China now has excess housing inventory of nearly five billion square metres, which is enough to house 150 million people.
- Loss of confidence – following the bursting of China’s property bubble and several high-profile developer bankruptcies, there is little confidence in the housing market from home buyers and investors which is weighing on new home sales.
- Population crisis – China’s population is expected to decline by ~100 million people by 2050 according to the UN, which will negatively impact future housing demand.
While China has signalled its intention to stabilise the property market with measured stimulus, this is being delicately balanced with the desire to transition towards a consumer-centred economy.
Overall, we expect structural pressures on housing to weigh on China’s construction activity and hence global steel demand over the medium and long-term.
Soft medium-term supply/demand outlook
Global iron ore production is poised to moderately increase over the medium-term. Supply growth will be led by Brazilian major, Vale, as it progresses on its key expansion projects.
In combination, the challenged demand outlook and moderate supply growth together is likely to underpin a moderation in iron ore prices over time, which is reflected in consensus estimates.
Retaining Selective Iron Ore Exposures
The Focus Portfolio retains an underweight exposure to iron ore compared to the ASX 300, with key portfolio exposures being BHP (BHP) and Mineral Resources (MIN).
While iron ore faces long-term headwinds, Australia’s iron ore majors are among the lowest cost producers in the world (with average total cash costs of ~US$40/tonne), which underpins significant profitability even at considerably lower iron ore prices.
Another key appeal of the sector is that robust iron ore profits are increasingly being reinvested by the major producers into ‘future facing’ commodities with stronger structural outlooks (i.e. copper, lithium).
| Company name | Ticker | Portfolio / Market Weight % | Iron ore as a % of group revenue (FY25e) | 12 mth fwd PE | EPS CAGR (FY1-FY3) | Dividend yield (NTM) | 'Grossed up' yield | Net Debt / EBITDA (NTM) | ROIC (NTM) | |
| Focus Portfolio | ASX 300 | |||||||||
| BHP | BHP | 10% | 10% | 46% | 10.8 | -4% | 5.4% | 7.7% | 0.3 | 19% |
| Mineral Resources | MIN | 2% | 0% | 57% | 23.3 | 130% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 2.5 | 12% |
| Rio Tinto | RIO | 0% | 2% | 50% | 10.5 | -3% | 5.5% | 7.9% | 0.2 | 19% |
| Fortescue | FMG | 0% | 2% | 100% | 10.0 | -20% | 6.5% | 9.3% | 0.1 | 21% |
| Total | 12% | 14% | ||||||||
Source: Refinitiv, Visible Alpha, Wilsons Advisory. Data is accurate as of 17/06/2024 market close.
| FY25 free cash flow yield - at different iron ore prices* | ||||
| BHP | Rio Tinto | Fortescue | ||
| Iron ore price (US$/tonne) |
$130 |
9.7% | 9.7% | 11.4% |
$120 |
8.7% | 8.3% | 9.2% | |
$110 |
7.6% | 6.9% | 7.0% | |
$107 (spot price) |
7.3% | 6.5% | 6.4% | |
$100 |
6.6% | 5.5% | 4.9% | |
$96 (FY25 consensus price) |
6.2% | 5.0% | 4.0% | |
$90 |
5.5% | 4.1% | 2.8% | |
$80 |
4.4% | 2.8% | 0.6% | |
75 (long-term real price) |
3.9% | 2.0% | -0.5% | |
*Analysis is based on a number of assumptions for costs/production, and assumes other commodities (excluding iron ore) remain at spot prices through FY25. Analysis is based on ASX share classes (in AUD terms).
Source: Refinitiv, Visible Alpha, Wilsons Advisory. Data is accurate as of 17/06/2024 market close.
BHP Still Preferred Over Rio Tinto
BHP is held in the Focus Portfolio at a 10% weight.
Our focus within the iron ore sector is on the largest, lowest cost producers: BHP and Rio Tinto (RIO).
In addition to its attractive relative valuation, BHP remains our preference over RIO for two key reasons.
1. Lowest cost and capital intensity
BHP is the lowest cost iron ore producer in Australia, with unit costs of US$18/tonne compared to RIO at US$23/tonne, and a medium-term target of US$<17/tonne compared to RIO's target of US$20/tonne.
Moreover, RIO is in a heavy investment phase with significantly more capex planned to replace asset depletion. As a result, BHP is poised to deliver higher iron ore profits / free cash flows than RIO over the next decade.
2. Most diversified asset base, superior copper exposure
BHP is more diversified than RIO, with significantly more exposure to copper. This is a key appeal of BHP given the positive structural supply/demand outlook of the metal driven by the
energy transition.
Read Dr Copper’s Healthy Prognosis
Mineral Resources (MIN) – Transitioning into a Low-Cost Producer
MIN is held in the Focus Portfolio at a 2% weight.
The company offers diversified exposure to iron ore (~57% of FY25e revenues), as well as lithium (~24% of FY25e revenues) and mining services (~19% of FY25e revenues excluding intersegment).
Key appeals of MIN include its commodity diversification, as well as its high-quality mining services segment which generates ‘annuity-like’, contracted earnings from tier 1 miners.
With respect to iron ore specifically, we are attracted to MIN for two key reasons:
1. Strong production growth
After significant investment into Onslow Iron, the project achieved its first ore shipment last month. This project will be the key driver of MIN’s iron ore production growth and hence earnings growth over the medium-term.
2. Lower cost, higher quality operations
At nameplate capacity, Onslow Iron will be significantly lower cost than MIN’s existing producing assets. The project will transition MIN into a more profitable iron ore producer with greater protection from the commodity cycle.
Closing Thoughts on Iron Ore
While iron ore faces long-term headwinds from structural pressures on China’s housing market and the transition of China’s economy towards a consumption-centred model, the commodity remains a critical input into buildings, infrastructure, machinery, and the automotive/transportation sectors.
There is still merit to selectively investing in the sector given Australia’s iron ore majors are among the most profitable producers in the world and considering the attractive ‘bottom-up’ investment cases for BHP and MIN in particular.
Written by
Greg Burke, Equity Strategist
Greg is an Equity Strategist in the Investment Strategy team at Wilsons Advisory. He is the lead portfolio manager of the Wilsons Advisory Australian Equity Focus Portfolio and is responsible for the ongoing management of the Global Equity Opportunities List.
About Wilsons Advisory: Wilsons Advisory is a financial advisory firm focused on delivering strategic and investment advice for people with ambition – whether they be a private investor, corporate, fund manager or global institution. Its client-first, whole of firm approach allows Wilsons Advisory to partner with clients for the long-term and provide the wide range of financial and advisory services they may require throughout their financial future. Wilsons Advisory is staff-owned and has offices across Australia.
Disclaimer: This communication has been prepared by Wilsons Advisory and Stockbroking Limited (ACN 010 529 665; AFSL 238375) and/or Wilsons Corporate Finance Limited (ACN 057 547 323; AFSL 238383) (collectively “Wilsons Advisory”). It is being supplied to you solely for your information and no action should be taken on the basis of or in reliance on this communication. To the extent that any information prepared by Wilsons Advisory contains a financial product advice, it is general advice only and has been prepared by Wilsons Advisory without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the appropriateness of the advice in light of your own objectives, financial situation and needs before following or relying on the advice. You should also obtain a copy of, and consider, any relevant disclosure document before making any decision to acquire or dispose of a financial product. Wilsons Advisory's Financial Services Guide is available at wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures.
All investments carry risk. Different investment strategies can carry different levels of risk, depending on the assets that make up that strategy. The value of investments and the level of returns will vary. Future returns may differ from past returns and past performance is not a reliable guide to future performance. On that basis, any advice should not be relied on to make any investment decisions without first consulting with your financial adviser. If you do not currently have an adviser, please contact us and we would be happy to connect you with a Wilsons Advisory representative.
To the extent that any specific documents or products are referred to, please also ensure that you obtain the relevant disclosure documents such as Product Disclosure Statement(s), Prospectus(es) and Investment Program(s) before considering any related investments.
Wilsons Advisory and their associates may have received and may continue to receive fees from any company or companies referred to in this communication (the “Companies”) in relation to corporate advisory, underwriting or other professional investment services. Please see relevant Wilsons Advisory disclosures at www.wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures.