Equity Strategy
13 November 2024
Banks Reporting Season – Switching Lenders
The Bank Sector's Earnings Outlook Remains Uncompelling
 

Following the release of the major banks' FY24 results, our sector view remains unchanged, with the Focus Portfolio retaining an underweight exposure to the major banks. 

The ‘big 4’ banks all reported a decline in earnings in FY24, largely in line with consensus forecasts. Most importantly, however, their results did little to alter our cautious stance towards the sector. Despite modest upgrades to consensus forecasts over the last month, the sector’s medium-term earnings growth outlook remains uncompelling in the context of highly demanding valuations.

This report explores the key themes from the banks' reporting season (with a focus on Westpac, ANZ, and NAB, which all reported last week) and their relevance to the sector’s earnings growth trajectory, while also discussing recent changes to the Focus Portfolio’s banks positioning. 

The portfolio’s underweight exposure towards the sector is unchanged. However, we have removed NAB (-4.5%) from the portfolio and redeployed the proceeds into the better valued banks: Westpac (WBC) (+2.5% to a weight of 5.5%) and ANZ (+2% to a weight of 8%).

Figure 1: The ‘big 4’ banks have received modest consensus upgrades over the last month
Figure 2: Despite modest upgrades, the banks sector continues to offer uncompelling earnings growth over the medium-term
 
 

Key Themes from the Banks Sector Reporting Season

1. Credit growth remains resilient despite restrictive monetary policy

Despite the ongoing impact of elevated interest rates, housing credit growth has picked up since mid-2023 to around the post-GFC average, while business credit growth remains above its post-GFC average. 

The unusual level of resilience in mortgage demand throughout this tightening cycle (despite restrictive monetary policy) has been driven by rising home prices (fuelled by population growth and constrained housing supply) and strong nominal income growth. However, the RBA has pointed out that while housing credit growth is sound, it is ‘not that strong’ and reaffirmed that financial conditions remain restrictive. 

We expect housing credit growth to remain stable around average levels in FY25, with the key swing factor being the timing and magnitude of RBA cash rate cuts. Delays to prospective rate cuts would likely result in weaker credit growth over the medium-term.

Figure 3: Housing credit growth has accelerated since mid-2023
Figure 4: ANZ and WBC’s mortgage books are growing above system, while NAB is losing share

2. Moderating competition underpins stabilising margins

Competitive intensity in the mortgage and deposit markets was a significant headwind to net interest margins (NIMs), and therefore major bank earnings in FY24. These competitive dynamics were highlighted by Westpac (WBC), which (after varying its pricing throughout FY24) noted that when its pricing was above market, it experienced greater outflows.This demonstrates that pricing remains a key driver of the mortgage market. 

However, the stabilisation of ANZ and Westpac’s NIMs in 2H24 suggests that competitive pressures are easing. While competitive dynamics are inherently difficult to predict, the major banks have generally guided towards continued but ‘moderating’ competitive pressures over the next year. 

This backdrop should allow for relatively stable margins in FY25, which is already reflected in consensus estimates. 

Overall, we don’t see meaningful upside risks to consensus NIM forecasts over the medium-term, given RBA rate cuts are currently expected over the next twelve months and due to ongoing political pressure on loan rates. 

Figure 5: ANZ and Westpac’s NIMs increased sequentially in 2H24, while NAB’s contracted further
Figure 6: Net interest margins are expected to stabilise in FY25

3. Bad debts remain low, but asset quality is deteriorating

Bad debts (i.e. loan impairments) have remained benign, despite elevated interest rates and cost of living pressures. However, asset quality (as measured by arrears – loans where interest payments are late but have not yet been impaired) weakened in FY24, with NAB showing the clearest deterioration as non-performing loans increased +17.7% in 2H24 (vs 1H24). 

We continue to expect bad debts to rise over the medium-term, given weakening asset quality metrics, which will be the key headwind to bank earnings over the next few years. The key factor that could drive upgrades or downgrades to consensus bad debt forecasts will be the timing and magnitude of RBA rate cuts, alongside the direction of home prices, unemployment, and nominal income growth. 

Figure 7: Loan arrears have increased meaningfully since FY22
Figure 8: Rising loan impairments will be the key headwind to bank earnings over the medium-term

4. Strong balance sheets underpin strong capital returns

The ‘big 4’ banks all continue to enjoy strong capital positions. The sector remains very well capitalised, with CET1 (common equity tier 1) ratios ranging from 12.2-12.5% - well above APRA's target range of 11-11.5%, which has underpinned share buybacks from all of the ‘big 4’. While the banks are currently taking a conservative approach to their capital positioning, in our view there is scope for further capital returns to shareholders in FY25, which will be modestly (low single-digit %) accretive to EPS in the near-term.

Figure 9: Westpac was the only major bank to announce a new buyback at its FY24 result
 
 

Earnings Outlook Remains Uncompelling

In summary, stabilising margins, sound credit growth, and share buybacks will support earnings over the medium-term. However, this will be largely offset by the headwind of rising loan impairments. As such, everything considered, the sector continues to have a relatively unattractive earnings growth outlook, with all of the banks offering only low single-digit EPS growth over the medium-term. In this context, we continue to view bank valuations as excessive overall, with the ASX 200 bank index currently trading on a 12-month forward PE of 18.4, which is ~30% above its five-year average, and represents an uncharacteristic premium to the broader ASX 200 index.

Figure 10: Bank valuations are stretched on both an absolute and relative basis
 
 

Simplifying Our Bank Exposures

The portfolio remains materially underweight the banks. However, we have removed NAB from the Focus Portfolio and upweighted Westpac (WBC) and ANZ, which both offer attractive relative value in a sector where valuations remain excessive on the whole.

Our rationales for these changes are explored below.

Figure 11: Focus Portfolio changes
Name Ticker 
Focus Portfolio weight %
ASX 300 weight %
Active weight (current)
Pre changes
Change
Current
National Australia Bank NAB 4.5% -4.5% 0.0% 4.8% -4.8%
ANZ Group ANZ 6.0% 2.0% 8.0% 3.8% 4.2%
Westpac WBC 3.0% 2.5% 5.5% 4.4% 1.1%
Commonwealth Bank CBA 0.0% - 0.0% 9.9% -9.9%
'Big 4' banks 13.5% - 13.5% 22.9% -9.4%

Source: Refinitiv, Wilsons Advisory.

 
Figure 12: ANZ and Westpac offer the best relative value out of the ‘big 4’
Name Ticker
Valuation metrics (12 month forward)
12 month forward yield
Diluted EPS growth
Return on Equity
P/E
5yr avg
+/- vs avg
Dividend yield
Grossed up
FY24a
FY25-27e (CAGR)
FY25
FY26
FY27
Commonwealth Bank CBA 25.3 18.5 36% 3.2% 4.5% -2% 2% 13.3% 13.5% 13.7%
National Australia Bank NAB 17.4 13.6 28% 4.3% 6.1% -5% 1% 11.3% 11.2% 11.3%
*Westpac WBC 15.9 12.7 25% 5.0% 7.1% -2% 1% 9.5% 9.6% 9.8%
*ANZ Group ANZ 14.0 12.0 17% 5.3% 7.0% -8% 3% 9.9% 9.8% 9.9%
Big 4 banks ( average) 18.1 14.2 28% 4.4% 6.2% -4% 2% 11.0% 11.0% 11.2%

*Focus Portfolio holdings post changes. Source: Refinitiv, Visible Alpha, Wilsons Advisory.

Removing NAB – premium valuation hard to justify amidst a declining ROE

We were previously attracted to NAB for its attractive return on equity (ROE), its leading business banking segment (which is traditionally less competitive than home lending), and its cost discipline, which has historically justified a premium to peers. However, these relative appeals are fading, which makes its rich valuation increasingly difficult to justify. 

NAB’s ROE declined in 2H24 and will likely remain constrained over the medium-term due to increased competition in business banking, rising expected credit losses and higher operating costs (OPEX). 

In its FY24 result, NAB guided to a meaningful increase in investment spend to $1.8 billion in FY25 (+10% vs FY24) aimed primarily at defending its incumbency in business banking. This has driven upgrades to consensus OPEX, and hence downgrades to consensus EPS and ROE estimates over the medium-term. 

Overall, with NAB’s ROE superiority (vs WBC and ANZ) declining, and it offering EPS growth that is expected to be broadly in-line with peers, we now see its valuation premium as unwarranted. Now is an opportune time to remove NAB following its ex-dividend date on 12/11/2024.

 

Adding to Westpac (WBC) 

Westpac has been upweighted, primarily due to its attractive relative valuation and strong capital returns profile (see figure 9).

In addition, given WBC’s strong balance sheet which has $3.5bn of excess franking credits, we believe WBC is likely to announce a special dividend over FY25/26. The bank has also demonstrated positive operational momentum, with its NIM and ROE rising sequentially in 2H24 (in contrast to NAB). Moreover, WBC's asset quality remains strong, and its home loan book is growing above system, which has been supported by a rising Net Promoter Score and positive Market Financial Institution satisfaction ratings. 

WBC’s focus on simplification and tech consolidation – under its UNITE program – has laid the foundations for sustainably higher ROE over the medium-term. WBC currently offers an attractive (grossed up) forward dividend yield of 7.1%.

 

Adding to ANZ - our preferred exposure as the best value bank

ANZ has been upweighted. The bank has the most attractive relative valuation compared to the majors (see figure 12), a robust balance sheet (CET1 of 12.2%) and an attractive capital returns profile (see figure 9). 

ANZ’s acquisition of Suncorp Bank has improved the scale of the group’s loan book, while the timing of the deal has proven astute, with Suncorp demonstrating growth in customers, deposits and its lending book since the acquisition was first announced two years ago. The integration of Suncorp is expected to unlock material revenue and cost synergies, which management has suggested could be larger and sooner than previously anticipated, notwithstanding integration risks. 

Meanwhile, the rollout of its new and improved tech stack - including its retail platform ANZ Plus (by ~2028), and its institutional and business platform Transactive (by ~2025) should improve the ANZ customer experience and unlock efficiencies. This will support ANZ's ongoing mortgage turnaround. The bank's goal is to increase its mortgage market share (currently 13.6%) back to its target of 2018 levels (of ~16%) (ex-Suncorp). Pleasingly, ANZ' momentum has been strong, with the bank posting impressive above-system growth in FY24 (see figure 4). ANZ currently offers an attractive (grossed up) forward dividend yield of 7.0%.

 

Commonwealth Bank (CBA) (not held)

Despite CBA being a high-quality bank with a sector-leading ROE, its valuation premium to peers (and history) is excessive – particularly given its EPS growth is likely to be in line with the peer average over the medium-term. CBA trades on a forward price-to-book ratio of 3.0x, which is a ~90% premium to the other ‘big 4’ banks, and a forward PE multiple of 25x, which is a ~60% premium to peers. 

  • Share This Article

Written by

Greg Burke, Equity Strategist

Greg is an Equity Strategist in the Investment Strategy team at Wilsons Advisory. He is the lead portfolio manager of the Wilsons Advisory Australian Equity Focus Portfolio and is responsible for the ongoing management of the Global Equity Opportunities List.

Disclaimer and Disclosures

About Wilsons Advisory: Wilsons Advisory is a financial advisory firm focused on delivering strategic and investment advice for people with ambition – whether they be a private investor, corporate, fund manager or global institution. Its client-first, whole of firm approach allows Wilsons Advisory to partner with clients for the long-term and provide the wide range of financial and advisory services they may require throughout their financial future. Wilsons Advisory is staff-owned and has offices across Australia.

Disclaimer: This communication has been prepared by Wilsons Advisory and Stockbroking Limited (ACN 010 529 665; AFSL 238375) and/or Wilsons Corporate Finance Limited (ACN 057 547 323; AFSL 238383) (collectively “Wilsons Advisory”). It is being supplied to you solely for your information and no action should be taken on the basis of or in reliance on this communication. To the extent that any information prepared by Wilsons Advisory contains a financial product advice, it is general advice only and has been prepared by Wilsons Advisory without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the appropriateness of the advice in light of your own objectives, financial situation and needs before following or relying on the advice. You should also obtain a copy of, and consider, any relevant disclosure document before making any decision to acquire or dispose of a financial product. Wilsons Advisory's Financial Services Guide is available at wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures.

All investments carry risk. Different investment strategies can carry different levels of risk, depending on the assets that make up that strategy. The value of investments and the level of returns will vary. Future returns may differ from past returns and past performance is not a reliable guide to future performance. On that basis, any advice should not be relied on to make any investment decisions without first consulting with your financial adviser. If you do not currently have an adviser, please contact us and we would be happy to connect you with a Wilsons Advisory representative.

To the extent that any specific documents or products are referred to, please also ensure that you obtain the relevant disclosure documents such as Product Disclosure Statement(s), Prospectus(es) and Investment Program(s) before considering any related investments.

Wilsons Advisory and their associates may have received and may continue to receive fees from any company or companies referred to in this communication (the “Companies”) in relation to corporate advisory, underwriting or other professional investment services. Please see relevant Wilsons Advisory disclosures at www.wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures.

Related articles